Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Missing: feet!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

S.I.G.-Newton ([info]lawofgravity) wrote,
@ 2009-04-07 18:10:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
010: yesterday a hurricane had blown away my long red cape
Rather than add to the volume of posts bemoaning whatever unfortunate circumstances I may personally anticipate in regards to the assignment at the front of everyone's consciousness, I would like to examine the idea of costumes. There have been numerous studies on the sociological impact of costumed vigilantism, and anyone who's grown up in Neopolis should at least be aware of the basics of costume theory -- I know we did a unit on Ulrich Ubermensch in Gen. Ed. at Olympia, and I'm sure other institutions might have covered similar topics.

At any rate, it's not something I feel a particular need to discuss, as there's little I can say that those who care to hear won't already know. What I would, however, like to discuss is the open secret of the difference between women's and men's super-apparel. I'm sure most can agree that female supers are, by and large, expected to dress more provocatively than men. While spandex spans both genders, women often seem to be wearing less spandex. As such, I'm surprised at the dearth of formal research on women's super-costumes, as well as the sociological implications and results of the difference between their costumes and men's. I would say the most recent and prominent examination of female sexuality in costumed vigilantism would be the Watchmen movie, and that hardly counts for academic purposes.

It may seem strange that I, as a male, would be the first to post this, but I am of the opinion that this is a subject that ought to be addressed. First, I would like to question the societal factors that would drive a woman to make such a choice, as opposed to men, whose costumes tend to be a touch more practical. Secondly, I would like to examine the effects of wearing -- does it allow a woman the desired influence over male opponents (or, I suppose, any opponent attracted to women, regardless of gender)? What bearing does sexually provocative apparel have on potential sexual harassment? What effect does, say, objectification of a female superhero have on her ability to seem "tough" in fighting crime? There are scores of questions to be asked on the topic, and so few concrete answers.

However, I'm afraid we can't always do as we like, and the demands of this project -- as well as those of my other classes -- supercede any interest I may have in the examination of these questions.


(Post a new comment)


[info]weremoth
2009-04-07 07:45 pm UTC (link)
Omg noooo~ I've been crushed by a fucking WALL OF TEXT!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 07:46 pm UTC (link)
My apologies. Would you rather I cut it? That way, it will be simpler for you to simply scroll right past.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]weremoth
2009-04-07 07:48 pm UTC (link)
It's too late for me, save yourself!!!

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 07:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]weremoth, 2009-04-07 07:52 pm UTC

[info]delphian
2009-04-07 07:46 pm UTC (link)
I'd rather read/write an expansion on this, instead of making a costume.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 07:48 pm UTC (link)
As would I.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Steve.
[info]delphian
2009-04-07 07:50 pm UTC (link)
I think I'm probably just going to wear enough black to look appropriately mysterious. The end.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Violet. - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 07:52 pm UTC
Steve. - [info]delphian, 2009-04-07 08:00 pm UTC
Violet. - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 08:08 pm UTC
Steve. - [info]delphian, 2009-04-07 08:12 pm UTC
Violet. - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 08:44 pm UTC

[info]colonelfabulous
2009-04-07 07:51 pm UTC (link)
oh, you SING IT SISTER. how dare this beady-eyed pseudointellectual presume he knows anything about the basic design and construction of a supersuit! as if anything these green-gilled adolescents could slap together would be remotely chic or functional as crime fighting garb! where do they get their several-thousand dollar destruction-proof fabric? heat-resistant metal? diamond-coated eyewear? chemical-proofing topcoat? not to mention the need of a highly developed fashion sense! you can't read a Cosmo and assume you can put together a dress -- the same way you can't read Hot Rod and craft a sports car out of your own two hands. this is preposterous. this is insulting.

not that you already don't know, stanley dearest. ♥

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 08:01 pm UTC (link)
I'm not entirely sure I follow what you're saying -- of if you've followed what I said, for that matter.

Furthermore, I don't intend on creating any of my own costume pieces myself, so you need not concern yourself there.

My name is Stephen.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)


[info]colonelfabulous
2009-04-07 08:10 pm UTC (link)
well i must admit i skimmed. but the real point of real importance is as i stated!

why hello stephen, are you a first-year? ♥

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 08:17 pm UTC

[info]brewskis
2009-04-07 07:52 pm UTC (link)
That's pretty much what I was saying by posting that picture.


:p

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]halftroll
2009-04-07 07:54 pm UTC (link)
I thought you were trying to get us to drink beer

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brewskis, 2009-04-07 07:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]halftroll, 2009-04-07 07:56 pm UTC

[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 07:56 pm UTC (link)
I am aware of that. However, beyond claiming that I will appear in goggles and briefs (which I'm sure no one wants less than I do), this is my most effective means of commenting on the idea.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]brewskis, 2009-04-07 08:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 08:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]brewskis, 2009-04-07 08:24 pm UTC
Annie. - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 08:32 pm UTC
Steve. - [info]brewskis, 2009-04-07 09:10 pm UTC
Annie. - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 09:57 pm UTC
Steve. - [info]brewskis, 2009-04-07 11:04 pm UTC

[info]halftroll
2009-04-07 07:54 pm UTC (link)
Yes

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 07:58 pm UTC (link)
Thank you for your agreement (?).

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]halftroll, 2009-04-07 08:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 08:09 pm UTC

[info]awesomeandy
2009-04-07 08:07 pm UTC (link)
solid a.

have you, by the way, ever heard the expression "most common superpower"?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 08:13 pm UTC (link)
I can't say I have, although I'd assume the most common superpower would be something along the lines of super-strength?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-07 08:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]halftroll, 2009-04-07 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-07 08:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-07 08:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]troublemakes, 2009-04-08 11:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 12:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]troublemakes, 2009-04-08 12:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 12:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faahrenheit, 2009-04-07 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-07 11:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faahrenheit, 2009-04-08 09:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 11:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]faahrenheit, 2009-04-08 11:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 11:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 11:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]faahrenheit, 2009-04-08 11:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 12:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faahrenheit, 2009-04-08 12:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 12:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]faahrenheit, 2009-04-08 12:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]awesomeandy, 2009-04-08 02:25 pm UTC

[info]clockworkings
2009-04-07 08:32 pm UTC (link)
I agree with you. I mean, why wear a skimpy outfit against armed assailants? It doesn't make sense.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 09:03 pm UTC (link)
That's another factor that definitely should be considered, especially considering we now have fibers that can be made both bulletproof and skintight.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]myfriendfergus
2009-04-07 08:35 pm UTC (link)
Maybe revealing clothes are easier to run around in?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-07 09:00 pm UTC (link)
I highly doubt the validity of your logic. In fact, considering the biological differences between men and women, I would even go so far as to suggest that your average woman would find it more uncomfortable to run around in revealing clothes than you or I -- the reason, I assume, many choose to wear more comfortable clothes while working out at the gym, etc. I might even go so far as to consider the ability to run around in revealing clothes as much a superpower as the "most common superpower" Andy mentioned.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]myfriendfergus, 2009-04-07 09:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]halftroll, 2009-04-07 09:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]myfriendfergus, 2009-04-07 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 09:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]myfriendfergus, 2009-04-07 09:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-07 09:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]myfriendfergus, 2009-04-08 07:59 am UTC

[info]likeanonion
2009-04-08 01:32 am UTC (link)
I'm not going to lie... I enjoy the skimpy outfits but if a girl feels uncomfortable in them, I would understand if she chose to wear something a bit more modest.




(Reply to this)


[info]faahrenheit
2009-04-08 10:02 am UTC (link)
it seems to me that the more skin you see, the more likely the super will be to kick your ass for looking at her the wrong way.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-08 10:22 am UTC (link)
But what of the increased chances that one might look at her the wrong way?

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]faahrenheit, 2009-04-08 10:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-09 12:47 am UTC

[info]goodneighbor
2009-04-08 03:46 pm UTC (link)
so much thinking

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lawofgravity
2009-04-09 12:46 am UTC (link)
Not really any more than usual -- just thoughts recorded and made public.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

(no subject) - [info]goodneighbor, 2009-04-09 11:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lawofgravity, 2009-04-09 11:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]goodneighbor, 2009-04-09 11:54 am UTC


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs